How about "tapestryforge"? I'm really happy with the "swiss army knife" motif from the Tapestry @ JavaForge stuff, and think we should run with that. I like the idea of many small projects, each focuses, each "finishable".
On 8/30/06, devel - Fashion Content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about choosing a different name than commons, as it isn't really a prerequisite for tapestry itself. Contrib perhaps, and then include the contrib library in it as a starting point. Henrik ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tapestry development'" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 5:00 PM Subject: RE: FW: Tapestry Commons Subproject... > Well, Howard is the TLP PMC chair, so I guess he would have to do > something > to get a subproject started. Maybe a vote? Maybe write up a proposal for > the subproject for its scope, etc. I don't know what the process is at > the > moment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:56 AM > To: Tapestry development > Subject: Re: FW: Tapestry Commons Subproject... > > Great! If you wanted to get the ball rolling on those things I can say you > have my "vote" for doing something like this. > > Obviously there's a lot of administrative things we'd need to figure out > but > it sounds like good stuff...As long as we don't make anything officially > available to people until Daniel's license click through work is complete > we > should be safe. (i hope/think) > > On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Here's the reply to my query... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz >> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Hypothetical New Code Scenario... >> >> On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > Suppose the Tapestry TLP project creates a new subproject called >> "Tapestry >> > Commons." Then, I want to add some code that I've developed outside of >> the >> > ASF to the Tapestry Commons subproject. Does that code have to go >> through >> > the incubator? My guess is that it does so that we avoid licensing/IP >> > issues. But, I just want to verify. >> >> Yes, it'll just need the IP clearance forms detailed in: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html >> >> HTH. -- justin >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Jesse Kuhnert > Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer > > Open source based consulting work centered around > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
