Martin Strand wrote: > Ask the mevenide dudes to add version number to the name displayed in > netbeans My initial reaction as well... on the other hand, i'm more used to thinking "Tapestry 4" as a separate product being in version 1.1 :) > > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:15:43 +0100, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >>> Sounds fine to me. I think Tapestry 5 is already on the right track: >>> >>> <name>Tapestry Core Library</name> >> >> >> doh... i did the change in the 4.1 pom, but now i can't easily tell if i >> have >> 4.1 or 5 open... they're both named "Tapestry Core Library" :( >> >> Is "Tapestry 4.1 Core Library" out of the question? >> >> >>> >>> On 11/7/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Anyone minds making the (project) names in all pom.xml >>>> a bit more descriptive? >>>> i.e. >>>> 'Tapestry Core Library' instead of 'Core Library' >>>> >>>> Mevenide uses that value to name the projects within the IDE... >>>> And anyway, i don't mind adding tapestry everywhere. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / J2EE Consulting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
