On 1/17/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd really like to explore the potential for this approach (default binding prefixes for parameters). I haven't gotten a lot of feedback ... Kent is very opposed to the idea. Jesse and a few others are for it. I think it will be neat. I'd don't want to ride roughshod over Kent's wishes, but I don't know how to proceed ... we need a protocol for evaluating the results of this experiment and deciding whether to commit to it or not while the Djinn is still in the bottle. Ideas?
Well, i'll go with the default binding but i don't usually use the template for this stuff, i always just put t:id (was jwcid) within the template and let others/coders do the binding... BTW i will proceed with this. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
