FWIW, the two Tap apps I've written have also needed access to the client
IP, so maybe it's not all that uncommon...


On 2/15/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've been following YAGNI principles about adding method to Request
that shadow HttpServletRequest ... that is, waiting until there's a
specific need.  It's not just the couple of lines of
Request/RequestImpl, but also the creation of the corresponding tests.
Adding a request to JIRA is not inappropriate, and less likely to get
misplaced than posting here.

On 2/15/07, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a very custom page which is only returning a byte stream, no
> text/html output just binary, I need to have access to the IP value to
> being able to verify some conditions, so i wish to have access to this
> value through org.apache.tapestry.services.Request.
>
> I know this is a very untypical usage of a Tapestry page and this
> could open a debate on "where we stop" adding value from
> HttpServletRequest to the Request wrapper but maybe this value could
> be useful to some one else.
>
> For the record i decided to use a Tapestry page and not going directly
> with a servlet since i can access all the nifty features from Tapestry
> IoC which has saved me a lot of typing and coding.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards
> --
> Massimo
> http://meridio.blogspot.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to