1) I shouldn't have to rely on the features of an IDE to make it non- annoying/non-tedious to work with a framework 2) I just don't see what you gain with type-safe bindings. This really doesn't seem that much different than having synthetic wrapper properties in your component class.

 -1 (non-binding)


Robert

On Feb 17, 2007, at 2/1710:19 AM , Jesse Kuhnert wrote:

This is a vote on whether or not we want anything in the type safe
refactoring branch to move forward within the confines of the Tapestry
project. It's not a discussion for or against the various aspects of
the arguments - there are obviously plenty of threads dealing with
that.

The only reason I bring it up is because I think we're heading in to
potentially dangerous waters with conflicting ideas. If this is the
only way to have a clear decision made then so be it.

-1

--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to