Well ... I've been thinking about that too. But I kind of want to keep
the short names for the eventual archetypes.  Or I need to rename
tapestry-simple to tapestry-simple-archetype.  Or maybe just simple.
Now's the time, while it's all still alpha!

On 3/5/07, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys,

I'm excited about T5 tapestry-spring-integration sub-project and the
upcoming hibernate integration, which I assume will be called
tapestry-hibernate-integration... but is there any chance we can go with
tapestry-spring and tapestry-hibernate instead? The "integration" seems a
bit redundant.

Just a suggestion!

Daniel



--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to