Well, you know, i've also asked about this before,
cause i'm clearly in favor of a 'full' release - that's actually what
https://nbtapestrysupport.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6266&expandFolder=6266&folderID=0
contains.

The usual answer of course has been that we aren't allowed to ... but
borrowing from a Cranberries album and from my next blog entry (T4+groovy)

Everybody Else Is Doing It, So Why Can't We?


Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
I took another look at our current releases and noticed that we aren't
exactly providing a lot in our distributions other than the tapestry jar
files themselves.

While looking around the other various apache (or any OS project for that
matter) project release bundles I noticed that they do helpfully include
their dependencies / other things for their users. Specifically, we can
look at either tomcat or struts - the recent struts release seems like a
good candidate to validate my argument though:

http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi#struts208

If you look through the "full" release you'll find:

apps/ - various war files
lib/ - All struts jars as well as all the other libraries it depends on.
Like OGNL  / antlr / various apache commons things / etc..
src/ - self descriptive
docs/ - Generated site documentation

I've just finished refactoring the 4.1.2 maven2 assembly descriptors to
produce basically the same exact thing. All license files / notices / etc
are in the right places but the release would also be completely self
contained.  No need to download anything from anywhere else once you get
it. I'd like to get some feedback on this move before I actually deploy it
to some kind of http://people.apache.org/~jkuhnert/release/ directory for
voting in case anyone sees any issues.

I know we've heard variations on this P.O.V. in apache legal but am starting to wonder if the reality of what we see in all other apache project releases
(meaning they include non apache jar dependencies as well, just hopefully
not gpl/lgpl / incompatible license dependencies) sort of dwarfs whatever
confusion may be coming from other sources.

Ie.  Why are we making users suffer when we don't have to?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to