Huh, I'll double-check, whether this was my fault. I know, I was fighting
with that one 10 days or so ago - but who knows what I messed up jar-wise.
I'll check tomorrow and tell you.

2007/6/26, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hmm....I wonder if this is really still true?  I've gone through great
pains
to ensure that both the body and the actual dom element are replaced for
IE
specifically so am slightly concerned if this is not the case.

I do know this was true for earlier versions of 4.1 (and possibly even
4.1.1or the starting point of
4.1.2)  and definitely true in Tacos but should not be true today.

Either way I guess if you know of a use case I can look at I"d love to get
this fixed in 4.1.3 if there is anything I've missed.  There is no excuse
for me to not have it work as intended.

On 6/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: mschulte
> Date: Tue Jun 26 13:21:12 2007
> New Revision: 550930
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550930
> Log:
> document behaviour described in TAPESTRY-1580
>
> Modified:
>     tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/src/site/apt/ajax/responsebuilder.apt
>
> Modified: tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/src/site/apt/ajax/responsebuilder.apt
> URL:
>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/src/site/apt/ajax/responsebuilder.apt?view=diff&rev=550930&r1=550929&r2=550930
>
>
==============================================================================
> --- tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/src/site/apt/ajax/responsebuilder.apt
> (original)
> +++ tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/src/site/apt/ajax/responsebuilder.apt Tue
Jun
> 26 13:21:12 2007
> @@ -50,7 +50,29 @@
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    The string value passed in to <<<updateComponent(String
componentId)>>>
> is the component id of the component
> -  you would like to update.
> +  the body of which you would like to update.
>
>    Tapestry will correctly manage and render all javascript/form
state/etc
> needed, depending on the component
>    type you are requesting an update on.
> +
> +  Note, that some Browsers (most notably, Internet Explorer) require
the
> updated body to consist of a single
> +  element. Thus, in your template, instead of
> +
>
>
++-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + <span jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> +    <span jwcid="@Insert" value="ognl:project.lead.name"
class="nameClas"
> />
> +    <span jwcid="@Insert" value="ognl:project.lead.email"
> class="mailClass" />
> + </span>
>
>
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +  you should rather have:
> +
>
>
++-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + <span jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> +   <span>
> +     <span jwcid="@Insert" value="ognl:project.lead.name"
> class="nameClas" />
> +     <span jwcid="@Insert" value="ognl:project.lead.email"
> class="mailClass" />
> +   </span>
> + </span>
>
>
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +
>
>
>


--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com




--
Marcus Schulte
http://marcus-schulte.blogspot.com

Reply via email to