[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nick Westgate updated TAPESTRY-1598:
------------------------------------

    Component/s:     (was: tapestry-ioc)

> Trivial SelectModels (e.g. Lists of Integer objects) now require a 
> ValueEncoder whereas before they "just worked".
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-1598
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1598
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.5
>            Reporter: Nick Westgate
>            Priority: Minor
>
> (This could be considered an enhancement except that it worked in a previous 
> snapshot.)
> Summary says it all but here's a simple example:
> html:
> <select t:type="select" t:value="someIntegerProperty" 
> t:model="selectModelList"></select>
> java:
>       public List getSelectModelList() // note list is currently broken as 
> per TAPESTRY-1597
>       {
>               List<Integer> model = new ArrayList<Integer>();
>               model.add(new Integer(1));
>               model.add(new Integer(2));
>               return model;
>       }
> Now results in the following exception:
> org.apache.tapestry.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException
> No adapter from type java.lang.Integer to type 
> org.apache.tapestry.services.ValueEncoderFactory is available (registered 
> types are java.lang.Enum, java.lang.String).
> Defining ValueEncoders for all the simple wrapper types used in domain 
> objects defeats the purpose of all the smart type conversion Tapestry does 
> elsewhere.
> Cheers,
> Nick.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to