It occurs to me that having .html as a file extension on the template files is weird, especially since they are by necessity well-formed xml documents, which html documents are not. Since they might be other kinds of documents than xhtml, would it make more sense to have them called .xml documents? It's a small thing, but worth considering.

Christian.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to