It occurs to me that having .html as a file extension on the template
files is weird, especially since they are by necessity well-formed xml
documents, which html documents are not. Since they might be other
kinds of documents than xhtml, would it make more sense to have them
called .xml documents? It's a small thing, but worth considering.
Christian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]