It would seem like a release for a release's sake. I'd hazard to say that almost everyone would have to upgrade immediately.
I'm actually about to drop back to 5.0.7 because between this, the whitespace change, and the URL optimization change, I have a wholly unusable application. I have to dig a little deeper into the optimization to see if I'm hitting an existing issue or a new one. I've just been crunched for time, unfortunately. -- Kevin On 1/24/08 1:54 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Jesse Kuhnert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no reason why you couldn't make a 5.0.10 release in the next > couple of days as well..right? > > (ie release early/often) > > On Jan 24, 2008 1:50 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2008 5:40 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This is a bug, please add an issue. >>> >>> It is not quite a show stopper. >>> >>> The difference is that blank fields used to show up as the empty >>> string and are now showing up in the properties as null. >> >> BTW i find more preferable to have a null when a textfield is left empty. >> >> Ciao >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
