I agree with kevin on this, also Jesse is too aggressive when someone mentions wicket.
Mentioning wicket is not a very good way to push an issue, but the response was definitely way too aggressive. ... somewhere in the apache docs is said that beng a comitter: (it's not a quote, I remember it something like this...) being a comiter is not about solving only the issues you are passionate about, but concentrating on the issues the community is most interested in.. Davor Hrg On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see anything particularly > inflammatory here. Maybe the priority level could be lowered. Maybe Jan > could attach a patch. But, JIRA is the appropriate channel for new feature > requests. If they're not in the design goals of the framework, they could > be closed with reason. > > I'd just urge everyone to relax a little bit and air grievances on the list > rather than in JIRA, which is the inappropriate medium. Please note that > this is not an endorsement either way on the issue at hand. > > -- > Kevin > > > > On 3/12/08 8:50 AM, "Jesse Kuhnert (JIRA)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > [ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl > > > ugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577834#action_1 > > 2577834 ] > > > > Jesse Kuhnert commented on TAPESTRY-2183: > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > I just don't think you understand how open source works Jan. > > > > If it was really that important then you should: > > > > a) Make a go of portlet support yourself. > > b) Have your company pay Howard to do it. > > > > The source is right there, so anyone can in theory jump right in and do > it. > > That's how it works. > > > >> Support Java Portlet Specification V2 - JSR-286 > >> ----------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Key: TAPESTRY-2183 > >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2183 > >> Project: Tapestry > >> Issue Type: New Feature > >> Components: Portlet > >> Affects Versions: 5.0 > >> Reporter: Jan Vissers > >> Fix For: 5.1 > >> > >> > >> Specification will be finished early 2008. We need a framework that > allows us > >> to write JSR-286 portlets, would be nice if we could stick with T5 for > this. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
