https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2384

Thar she blows!

Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Have you added an issue yet?
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Tapestry team,
>>
>>  Sven stumbled over situation in which Tapestry falls over when loading
>>  component classes, throwing an OOM exception. He and I have been looking
>>  into the problem which was first believed to be caused by a package
>>  structure being to deep. However after some closer examination, it's not
>>  that. The issue has to do with a temporary queue used to hold package
>>  names to be scanned for class files, in
>>  org.apache.tapestry.ioc.internal.services.ClassNameLocatorImpl. For more
>>  detail see the original bug report with our findings here:
>>
>>  http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-components/issues/detail?id=55
>>
>>  What it comes down to is this: if you have a file in the components
>>  package without a file extension (such as MIT-LICENSE), Tapestry will
>>  fail to start because it will have exhausted it's available memory and
>>  have thrown a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError exception. It assumes such
>>  files are directory names, and then tacks on a '/' and pushes it on to
>>  the queue to be searched. This results in a loop that fills the queue
>>  with bogus package names until the memory is gone.
>>
>>  Clearly this is an issue and I wanted to provide a patch, but having
>>  looked a bit at the code, I'm not sure how one can determine if the
>>  simple strings represent actual directories (as opposed to files with no
>>  extensions). A new file object could be created, but doing that for each
>>  iteration seems like it might be slow, as does querying the queue each
>>  time to see if that package is already contained.
>>
>>  --
>>  http://thegodcode.net
>>
>>
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-- 
http://thegodcode.net

Reply via email to