[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAPESTRY-2567.
------------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 5.0.15
         Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship

> Tapestry doesn't identify conflicting annotations on component fields
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-2567
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2567
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.14
>            Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>            Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>             Fix For: 5.0.15
>
>
> Currently, as the worker for an annotation is activated for a particular 
> field, the field is "claimed" by the annotation.
> When searching for fields with a given annotation, previously claimed fields 
> are ignored.
> Thus if you use conflicting annotations, such as @Persist and @Parameter, you 
> get no error and it's a guess as to which takes effect.
> Instead, we should see a failure when the second annotation work tries to 
> re-claim the field.  The exception should identify how the field was claimed, 
> for example, by identifying the annotation (or at least, annotation type) for 
> which the field was claimed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to