[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641051#action_12641051
]
Fernando commented on TAP5-119:
-------------------------------
I am also in the same boat!
Please, do not let Tapestry hijack our package names for its logging. Those
are two totally different things.
Debugging our application does not mean we have to debug tapestry!
So I agree, either a different root category ( like stated above, or
"tapestry.enhancer.[CLASS]" ), or TRACE level logging!
> remove DEBUG level logging in page/component log categories
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-119
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-119
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 5.0.15
> Reporter: Neeme Praks
> Priority: Minor
>
> While debugging with Tapestry5, I noticed one not-so-nice issue. But first, a
> bit of background.
> I usually configure my logging framework (log4j) to log all statements for my
> application at debug level during development. E.g. all log records logged to
> "com.mycompany.myapp" logging category get printed at DEBUG level. All other
> categories are usually at INFO level. This allows me to focus on the log
> statements that I have written and ignore all the verbose DEBUG logs of 3rd
> party libraries.
> Back to Tapestry5. I have configured by log4j as usual (my stuff at DEBUG
> level, everything else at INFO level). Although I expect to see only the log
> output produced by MY CODE, I also see some debug output produced by Tapestry
> internals. Seems that Tapestry class enhancement code logs to the same log
> category as the class name being enhanced. And the log statements are quite
> big (documenting the changes being made to the original classes), resulting
> in lots of unwanted noise in my logs.
> Example:
> I have a page: com.mycompany.myapp.pages.MyPage
> T5 class enhancement code logs its bytecode manipulation operations to log
> category "com.mycompany.myapp.pages.MyPage", at DEBUG level.
> This is not very nice, as I'm totally uninterested in seeing all this verbose
> T5-internal logging.
> I understand that it might be beneficial to have that class name as part of
> the logging category (or maybe not), but at the very least, I would recommend
> to add a T5 prefix to all those categories. The log category in above example
> would then become something like
> "org.apache.tapestry.classenhance.com.mycompany.myapp.pages.MyPage".
> For reference:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.tapestry.user/65644
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
