Em Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:14:14 -0300, Fernando Padilla <[email protected]>
escreveu:
Now, the format used by howard is definitely verbose in different ways,
but it was the most strict and covered the most cases.. it even
supported null values.. You can always replace it with a simpler
encoding format.. but please do not use just bare URLEncode, or you will
hit this bug eventually :)
You convinced me that the URLEncoder implementation is needed for solving
the slash problem. :) But could we at least use accented characters
unchanged? (the UTF ones below 0XFF) I'm just want a compromise between
stricteness and non-ugliness . . .
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
