Em Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:00:49 -0200, Igor Drobiazko
<[email protected]> escreveu:
Well, I actually don't care about names. We can rename it if needed. But
then we also should rename tapestry-webflow to tapestry-web-flow. ;)
Oops, I forgot about tapestry-webflow, so please ignore this comment. ;)
* Why don't we add some object validation service to Tapestry-IoC and
have tapestry-beanvalidator implement it? This way, non-web code can
also use the validation code.
We can do it in the future if needed.
Ok!
* I haven't read almost anything about JSR 303 yet, but does
tapestry-beanvalidator implement cross-property validation like
@AssertTrue or @AssertFalse?
This module doesn't implement any validator yet.
javax.validation.Validator?
* Is it the whole code or this commit is just a partial one?
Nope.
I didn't get your answer. I asked an enum question and received a boolean
response. :P
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
