so, Igor had requested to also go on with the 5.1 release and it looks like
I want to do it in the next 1-2 hours... so, if there are any
objections, speak fast!

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 22:56, Andreas Andreou <[email protected]> wrote:
> i just had a few words with Brian Fox from the maven team and if you try again
> you should see the options - it turns out any committer can stage
> releases @ nexus :)
>
> (uli, since you were a new committer and their auth system is not 100%
> automated,
> he had to enable ... something)
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 22:22, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No, I don't.
>>
>> On 23.12.2009 21:14 schrieb Andreas Andreou:
>>>
>>> so, you don't see an enterprise part in the left menu containing "staging"
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 22:06, Ulrich Stärk<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Seems so. I can successfully log into nexus but I can't do anything but
>>>> view
>>>> the different repos.
>>>>
>>>> Uli
>>>>
>>>> On 23.12.2009 20:50 schrieb Ulrich Stärk:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we somehow find out whether it's just PMC members who are allowed to
>>>>> stage releases at nexus?
>>>>>
>>>>> Uli
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18.12.2009 11:12 schrieb Andreas Andreou:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hmm - and something related... I'm not sure how important it is, but
>>>>>> according to
>>>>>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/pmc-gpg-keys.html
>>>>>> keys should also be found at http://pgp.mit.edu/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, the url of that contains PMC which got me thinking and I'm not
>>>>>> sure if i've read it somewhere, but i have the feeling only PMC can
>>>>>> stage releases at nexus - i gotta run for a few hours, so, can't quite
>>>>>> check it out right now :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:07, Andreas Andreou<[email protected]>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ok, based on Ulrich feedback and ... parts of myself, i've moved the
>>>>>>> Binary / Source Distributions step back before the voting step, fixed
>>>>>>> 1-2 links that
>>>>>>> were not showing and and updated
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~andyhot/tapestry-site/dev/checklist-new.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I'd also like to try it on 5.0 myself, are you ok in doing 5.1 ?
>>>>>>> I'm thinking for later tonight or (at worst) at some time on
>>>>>>> Saturday...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there something wrong if we do both at basically the same time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:26, Igor
>>>>>>> Drobiazko<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No more comments. I suppose we can go ahead with the releases. I
>>>>>>>> would like
>>>>>>>> to try the new release process this weekend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Andreas Andreou<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> i've documented the new release process at :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~andyhot/tapestry-site/dev/checklist-new.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eandyhot/tapestry-site/dev/checklist-new.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For comparison, the previous process is at :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~andyhot/tapestry-site/dev/checklist.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eandyhot/tapestry-site/dev/checklist.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The process can be summarized as:
>>>>>>>>> 1) mvn release:prepare
>>>>>>>>> 2) mvn release:perform
>>>>>>>>> 3) Login to Nexus, 'close' automatically created staging repository
>>>>>>>>> and note its url.
>>>>>>>>> 4) Send vote email ... 3 days pass
>>>>>>>>> 5) Login to Nexus and promote the release
>>>>>>>>> 6) Generate and upload Binary / Source Distributions (currently
>>>>>>>>> needs ant)
>>>>>>>>> 7) Once files reach all mirrors, update the Downloads Page
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steps 1-5 are really straightforward/automated (meaning that no
>>>>>>>>> manual
>>>>>>>>> copying of
>>>>>>>>> files is needed).
>>>>>>>>> The artifacts of step 6 could perhaps also be generated by maven
>>>>>>>>> (and thus
>>>>>>>>> be staged as well) but i'm not sure if we can spend time on this
>>>>>>>>> right now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because of that (and that's the only difference to the previous
>>>>>>>>> workflow),
>>>>>>>>> i've moved the Binary / Source Distributions step at the very end,
>>>>>>>>> i.e. after the
>>>>>>>>> vote has passed. Is that a deal-breaker? The alternative would be
>>>>>>>>> to move
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> step just before step 4.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, please take a look and comment if something needs more
>>>>>>>>> explanation
>>>>>>>>> or changes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>>>>>>>>> Tapestry / Tacos developer
>>>>>>>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>>>>>>> http://tapestry5.de/blog
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
>>>>>>> Tapestry / Tacos developer
>>>>>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
> Tapestry / Tacos developer
> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>



-- 
Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to