Why can't we do that with the generated content? I have to admit that
that point might be a bit more time-consuming, but I believe that having
an up-to-date documentation uncoupled from the release cycle is more
benefitial than spending some extra time when doing a release. In the
end releases are cut every 3 to 6 months. Do we really want to wait that
long for a documentation improvement to be published?
Uli
Howard Lewis Ship schrieb:
One advantage to generating the documentation (not using Confluence)
is the ability to create a static, stand-alone snapshot that we could
make available along with the source and binary distributions.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote:
Apart from that we can also put the exported content under version control.
Uli
Piero Sartini schrieb:
I really like having everything under version control!
Confluence is doing a great job with its version control. Of course
it's no hg, git or subversion - but versioning their content and
visualize the changes is one of the main functionalities of wikis.
Piero
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
