I've recently started developing a Tapestry application using only Scala and
so far it's been working great.
One thing that annoys me a little is the fact that i have to annotate all my
classes with the @scala.reflect.BeanInfo so that proper bean getter and
setters are generated and discovered by Tapestry.
What i'd like is to do this in Scala:
class MyComponent {
var myProperty
}
and Tapestry would be able to use "myProperty" as a real property, because
it actually is. It's just that Scala doesn't use the java beans convention
for getters and setters name.
Anyway, i was wondering if you guys agree with adding support for Scala
properties into Tapestry or if that's a direction you don't want to take.
If you agree with incorporating such change, i'll gladly submit a patch with
the required change to make this work.
Cheers.
