On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Igor Drobiazko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Question: what should the behavior be in the case where the method >> throws a checked exception? As currently written, the persistent >> field data will still be discarded ... is that what you want? >> > > Good catch. I was not sure about the behavior in case of an exception and > hoped to get some comments. Shall we keep the values in this case? I think it's definitely better to keep data. > We can also add a parameter saying what to do in case of an exception. The > param would default to "keep values". Well i don't see a reason for a know here cause you can always perform manual clean in case but if you want to make it knob-able set the default to keep data indeed. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
