I was waiting to hear from one of the original developers (Robin) after he
gets a chance to take a look at my changes before deciding what to do / when
to release stuff. I think that all changes w/o the ClassTransformation fixes
might make a nice Spring 3 + T5.1 compatible release, whereas the ones w/
the ClassTransormation changes would make a nice Spring 3 + T5.2 bundle.

Anyway, it's good to hear that it works for you. I can't say I've grokked
the whole codebase yet; the migration (w/ the exception of
ClassTransformation) was mostly an exercise in tracking down the newly
repackaged & renamed classes from Spring Security 2 to S-S 3. Thus, I was
concerned that I might have missed something un-obvious.

Do you want to send me a patch (or just the POM file) w/ the updated pom  so
that I don't have to duplicate your effort ?

Regards,

Alex Kotchnev

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Pierce Wetter <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On May 10, 2010, at 1:39 PM, akochnev [via Tapestry Developers] wrote:
>
> > Pierce,
> >    I just committed the changes to tapestry-spring-security to support
> > spring-security 3.0.2 (and spring 3.0.2) and work w/ the latest T5.2
> > snapshots . The changes are in the T-s-s SVN trunk since yesterday. The
> > rewrite of T-s-s is exactly the reason for my questions on this topic.
> >
> >    I haven't removed the extra private fields that the old code used to
> > create, but you're right - they're probably expendable.
>
>   Oh, cool. Doing a source compare....
>
>  Yeah, you mostly replicated what I did.
>
>   The pom.xml checked in is still out of date. I made the following
> changes:
>
>      1. I updated the various version numbers in the properties.
>
>      2. I pointed the repositories at the EBR stuff mentioned on spring
> source.
>
>  Hey! It worked!
>
>  Are you going to put a 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT up?
>
>  Pierce
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry-developers.221625.n2.nabble.com/T5-2-ClassTransformation-why-deprecate-throw-an-exception-tp5028206p5033289.html
> Sent from the Tapestry Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to