I'm just starting to crank through the documentation; but the gmaven plugin should compile .groovy to .class for us and Hudson should not need to care.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Andreas Andreou <[email protected]> wrote: > not at all -- anything resulting in fewer LOC and easier to read code should > be allowed > > Do you think we'll have trouble running them in hudson - i think i've seen > a tutorial on how to setup groovy tests with maven some months ago, but > perhaps you already have this covered? > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 18:16, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to start experimenting with writing some of the Tapestry >> tests in Groovy, rather than Java. Any objections? >> >> -- >> Howard M. Lewis Ship >> >> Creator of Apache Tapestry >> >> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to >> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! >> >> (971) 678-5210 >> http://howardlewisship.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Andreas Andreou - [email protected] - http://blog.andyhot.gr > Tapestry / Tacos developer > Open Source / JEE Consulting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
