On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andreas Andreou <[email protected]> wrote:
>> PS. The new bylaws make it even simpler to end up in a situation where
>> PMC is unable to act - just something to consider
> Can you expand on that? What is the problem / gaps you're seeing?

Whoops, I'll withdraw that statement. I really should read the fine
print - I was thinking of 3/4 PMC majority but it does say: "PMC by a
3/4 concensus vote (i.e. at least 3 binding +1 votes and at least 3/4
of all binding votes, no binding vetos)." - so it does clarify the
rule for outvoting from the PMC and make it simpler.

Kalle

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to