On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Josh Canfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> What is the argument against making 5.2 the branch? It's been voted as > stable, if there are significant problems that need to be fixed I'm happy to > do that, but if its stable then checking something in for 5.2 should be the > exception, not new features. > > The benefit of *not* working in a sandbox is eyes. I want people using this > stuff ASAP so we can start the process of proving its stable in environments > I can't account for. If we want to have a quicker release cycle then we need > to commit to our stable votes and move on. Correct me if I'm wrong but 5.2.x hasn't been declared stable yet. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
