On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:06:22 -0200, Josh Canfield <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hmm... yeah, it's hard distinction, but aren't some "extensions" built
into more than one module? For instance, hibernate-core and
hibernate... a Module is distinctive thing in tapestry (AppModule,
TapestryModule)
I'd say that:
* Tapestry doesn't have plugins (at least nothing with this name)
* 'extension' could be a good name, more easily understandable than
'module', which is mostly Tapestry-IoC vocabulary in this context.
* Calling everything a package wouldn't be bad either.
Roses would still smell the same even if they were called madeinusas, but
people wouldn't know what's being talked about. :P
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
