Do we usually vote before creating new sub-modules? Or is it a better to ask forgiveness than permission thing?
I'm for having more modules, in case that wasn't obvious before. Possibly for experimental modules we could have a incubator project... On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Robert Zeigler <[email protected]> wrote: > The thread on tapestry modules got me thinking a bit... > > Awhile back, Kevin Menard and I started an integration library between > tapestry and cayenne (http://cayenne.apache.org). I know Kevin was hoping > this would eventually move to be an "official" tapestry module (rather than > 3rd party), but I've been reluctant. What are your thoughts? We have an > "official" hibernate integration module; should we have an "official" cayenne > one? If so, I can move the code into a new tapestry sub-module. I use the > integration in several of my own projects and keep it compatible with the > current version of tapestry; I would take responsibility for continuing to > maintain the module under the tapestry umbrella. This isn't meant to be an > official vote, and I'm not set on moving it into tapestry. I'm just trying > to gauge how much interest there would be in having a better supported > cayenne integration module. > > Robert > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
