It looks like Selenium 2.0 can run using WebDriver where it directly works with the browser or emulating the older Selenium RC approach. Is WebDriver slow or is it when you try to run 2.0 using the older style tests? I thought part of the point of WebDriver was to be faster.
Mark On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been using Geb (a Groovy wrapper around Selenium 2.0) and I've > been having a lot of trouble since Selenium 2.0 changes things; just > swapping out the new code takes a huge hit on performance. I might > take a go at this, but I'd rather start thinking in terms of > deprecating the selenium support inside tapestry-test and seeing about > adopting Geb as a better solution that embraces Selenium 2.0. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
