Thanks for your response. I'm neutral to the decision if the module should be part of Tapestry or not. I think the idea of Ulrich was to have it in Tapestry: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1474 but I would also be fine to leave it as a separate module.
-- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Cross-site-request-forgery-protection-module-tp4685937p4686605.html Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
