On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Josh Canfield <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a problem with closing defects as "Might not be a problem > anymore". Do at least some due diligence so you can at least say > "can't reproduce"
Thanks for stepping forward and volunteering, Josh! Seriously, we need to get the bug list under control, it's hard to make out the legitimate issues among the droves of minor requests, weird questions, and duplicates. This isn't just blanket closing of issues, but if the issue is obscure and not well described, I think it is valid to add a polite message asking for it to be reopened when a test case is made available. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've been trying to clean up the Tapestry issue list. If everyone >>> could take a peek, and help weed out duplicates and such, it would be >>> great. >>> >>> I'm also in a quandrary about some bugs ... I'm very tempted to mark a >>> bunch of bugs that date back to 5.1 or earlier as "won't fix", >>> especially if they are fixed in 5.3 or no longer applicable. >>> Thoughts? >> >> Sure that should be done especially if they're so outdated. >> >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
