This should be deferred to 5.4 at this point. It is a welcome addition to T5!

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Christophe Cordenier
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> If we consider to add portlet support to Tapestry, the current Request
> object is maybe missing some methods. For example, let's say the developer
> want to answer an action request differently whether he is in a servlet or a
> portlet container, as we have isXHR() method maybe we should have a
> isPortletRequest() one.
>
> I am trying to see the Portlet support as a contribution without modifying
> anything to the core, but i have the feeling that the Tapestry Request API
> must evolve too. If it stands as an external contribution, the developer
> will have contribution's imports in its page, so that he will not be able to
> re-use it in another context. I think slight changes in the request API may
> help to fill the gap between servlet request and portlet request, and the
> contribution will do the rest.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Christophe Cordenier.
>
> Committer on Apache Tapestry 5
> Co-creator of wooki @wookicentral.com
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to