Hi Jochen Definitely not nonsense :)
Please file a jira regards Taha On Oct 13, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Jochen Berger wrote: > Hi there, > > I've been struggling whether to post this on the users' or the devs' list, > but I ended up asking here. Sorry if that's not appropriate. > So, from Tapestry 5.3, the underscore.js library is shipped. While I'm quite > happy about that fact, I'm getting issues with a JS library that also ships > underscore and also binds it to window._. > I also asked the devs to use the noConflict() mode to bind it in their own > namespace and I'd like to propose the same to you. I think that if libraries > provide a noConflict() mode, we should use it and not make the "Prototype > mistake", if you know what I mean. > I guess T5._ would be a good place for underscore.js to live in. And you > would still be free to bind it to a function-scoped var _ if you wanted to. > What do you think, should I raise a JIRA or do you think it's nonsense? > > Jochen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
