Although I haven't had a chance to try 5.3.2 yet,

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure; I think that just prooves that you have access to update
> that file; trust usually involves a key exchange, where to people
> verify each other's identify and sign each other's keys; I think
> that's what the warning means. The intent is, if person A is
> trustworthy and signs person B's key, the person B is probably who
> they say they are.
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder how we can extend or web of trust without physically meeting?
>>
>> Does "storing the KEYS" on people.apache.org provide the necessary
>> (read sufficient) safety?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Massimo
>> http://meridio.blogspot.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>
> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>
> (971) 678-5210
> http://howardlewisship.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to