Yes, I mentally billed the couple of hours I spent on it as
"marketing". It was good to learn how to use SQLLite3 and BoneCP
together. With a little time, I could make it almost as nice as the
Hibernate support. What I have is just:
/**
* Define a DataSource service.
*/
public DataSource buildBoneCPDataSource() throws Exception {
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("open_mode", String.valueOf(SQLiteOpenMode.READONLY));
BoneCPDataSource ds = new BoneCPDataSource();
ds.setDriverClass("org.sqlite.JDBC");
ds.setJdbcUrl("jdbc:sqlite:hello.db");
ds.setProperties(props);
ds.setUsername("n/a");
ds.setPassword("n/a");
// The test documentation indicates up to about 15 parallel
requests, so let's make sure there's
// always a connection ready in the pool.
ds.setMinConnectionsPerPartition(15);
ds.setMaxConnectionsPerPartition(20);
return ds;
}
What would be nice would be if you could inject a per-thread
Connection as easily as (with tapestry-hibernate) a per-thread
Session, and that the stack would ensure that the Connection was
released to the pool at the end of the request. Feels like a little
tapx library coming on at some point.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Ernesto Arroyo <[email protected]> wrote:
> in fact there is not such a "the best framework"
> there are some bad ones, as struts1 (ancient) and there are quite good ones,
> tapestry5, ruby on rails or GWT , and this comparitions have no sense
>
> Saludos cordiales,
> Ernesto Arroyo
>
>
> El 28/02/2012, a las 16:07, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]>
> escribió:
>
> Did you mean to say "Again, a totally useless marketing effort"?
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Again, a totally useless comparison.
>>
>> On 27.02.2012 19:15, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>> See https://github.com/seedifferently/the-great-web-framework-shootout.
>>> I don't have time right now to write the T5 test app for it myself but
>>> it'd be good opportunity to market Tapestry since there are no other
>>> Java-based framework in it yet. Tapestry would likely perform well and
>>> it'd be interesting regardless to see how a JVM-based implementation
>>> would stack up against the alternatives.
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
