Thanks Denis, +1 for @Order. I like the idea.
regards Taha On Mar 8, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Denis Stepanov wrote: > If you don't want "two ways" there is no need for the @Startup in the first > place, your argument doesn't make much sense to me, I'm sorry. I thought that > Tapestry motto is "code less", so if there is a second way with less code, > why it's a bad thing? > > Steve suggested on the mailing list the same improvement, why it doesn't > count? > > Denis > > Mar 8, 2012 v 2:28 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: > >> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:44:50 -0300, Denis Stepanov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I can change it to use the @Order, but I'm not sure Tapestry devs are >>> interested or even care to have it. >> >> Your wording makes it seem the Tapestry committers are ignoring user >> suggestions or patches. That isn't the case. Can't they disagree with user >> suggestions and patches? Actually, two of them already said they don't agree >> with your suggestion to avoid having two ways of doing the same thing, as >> the current one is good enough. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and >> instructor >> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
