On 18.04.2012 08:39, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There was a recent thread titled "Git for Log4PHP and CloudStack" on >> infrastructure@. In summary, infra is allowing more projects to merge >> to git, under the same terms as the initial set (projects sign up to >> help with potential git workflow issues, provide feedback, need to >> name a volunteer to act as a git coordinator with infra). Based on a >> few other projects I'm following and have moved to git, there doesn't >> seem to a lot of git related overhead. Massimo, would you be able to >> sign up as our git champion? I can help with initiating the requests >> etc. but I don't feel strongly enough about it to take it as a long >> term commitment. > I feel I'm a little bit overbooked now but I can see what I can do > during the weekend or the first days of the next week. > > Anyone object or has any doubt about this move? Do everyone agree? > > Cheers +0 I don't really care. I'm OK with SVN and I'll be OK with Git. I don't see any advantages by choosing one over the other. If you have the time to see this through, go ahead. I don't want to see this stalled halfways through though. If you commit to work on it I expect that you don't stop until it's done ;).
Remember. Moving to Git requires volunteering for infra work and reporting to the board on the community impact. Uli --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
