On Sat, 05 May 2012 23:51:47 -0300, Carsten Klein (JIRA) <[email protected]>
wrote:
The least I wanted to have was an otherwise useless component consuming
valuable memory, and you know that comments can get rather lengthy. Your
approach would keep all of this in memory for all templates loaded on a
per thread basis...
I don't think what you're saying is correct. Since Tapestry 5.2, there's a
single instance of each page loaded in memory and there's no per-thread
copy of template of pages nor components, so you're concern is not valid
AFAIK.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
