On 23.06.2012 01:14, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I'm also concerned about the state of our documentation; these changes are
> going to mean far, far more of our {since} caveats; I'm concerned that our
> documentation will become a maze of these things! Having the ability to
> create a parallel branch of the documentation (documentation as source
> code, not as wiki pages) would be very nice.
We had this discussion roughly two years ago and we put a great effort into
moving away from
documentation in source code to documentation in a wiki. There were several
reasons for that, most
notably decoupling documentation releases from code releases and giving
non-committers the
opportunity to contribute.
I guess we could move the documentation to yet another format, back into vc and
start releasing it
alongside Tapestry, thus making changes more clear. With a bit of integration
work that might even
work with Apache's CMS thus allowing for anonymous contributions. I won't have
the cycles to drive
this though until at least mid-august.
Uli
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
