On Sunday, October 21, 2012, Massimo Lusetti wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Well, it was undocumented anyway so no reason to go overboard with
> > compatibility if it's that big of a problem. Assuming all other things
> > are reasonably well backwards compatible and we have the main
> > libraries up-to-date at GA, it'll be just something that we need to
> > communicate to the community.
>
> For what I've seen in the code that seems the actual issue and I agree
> with you in the way it should addressed.
> I will try to produce an alpha asap to let a broader audience to look
> at and then check the feedback.



I think it is early for an alpha, as many components are broken currently
as we are mid-transition.

I do want to get a preview out soon.


>
> For what is my own part a small amount of work on the js side of my
> apps should let me upgrade to future 5.4
>
> Cheers
> --
> Massimo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;>
>
>

-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

Reply via email to