On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:15:24 -0200, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Completely agree about breaking existing code, it's my main concern, but
I think the platform (tapestry5) must have a natural way (no user
intervention like place annotation) to handle requests to URL which
actually do not exists.
How Tapestry would know that an URL doesn't exist when the root Index page
may or may not receive a page context? It's impossible to do that without
some explicit intervention from the developer (annotation, configuration
symbol, etc).
By the way, why are you against the annotation? Do you think it's possible
for Tapestry to automatically know whether an Index page takes a context
or not?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
