Vote is canceled, I'll come up with a new vote on a new issue to try to be more clear.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've never said we couldn't have both. In the original thread discussion I > said we should have both. I just said that the vote shouldn't include the > annotations, as they don't affect existing code, while Steve's proposal > does, so I think it should be voted. > > > On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:48:10 -0200, Taha Siddiqi <tawus.tapes...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We can have a mix of both. :) >> >> I use an annotation @RestrictActivationContext and it takes the number of >> activation context parameters allowed. It also uses a worker for >> implementation. So if we have to restrict a page to only two parameters we >> can annotate the page with @RestrictActivationContext(2) >> >> I found it useful at times but if we have an application wide >> configuration for pages where there are no activation contexts, it will be >> useful too. >> >> regards >> Taha >> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 12:19 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: >> >> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:54:33 -0200, Kalle Korhonen < >>> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Massimo, I encourage you take a crack at implementing speculative >>>> support >>>> for this as you see it. Until we have a concrete implementation, we are >>>> talking in circles. If we voted on everything one might or might not do, >>>> we'd never never get anywhere. As I mentioned in the other thread, I >>>> don't think Steve Eyron's proposal is sufficient. >>>> >>> >>> If you're talking about the annotations, I think that's something that >>> doesn't need a vote, as just implementing them won't change the existing >>> behavior of Tapestry applications. On the other hand, Steve's proposal does >>> change, so I think it needs a vote and it'll get a +1 from me. >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> --------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
