Yes, but it is optional. Anything you don't want to specify using an annotation on the interface can be specified instead using the ServiceBinder interface, or as an annotation on a module method.
Ok, in this case, if you want to use the Tapestry-specific magic, you get to use the Tapestry-specific annotation. If you don't like that, you can inject the underlying JPASessionManager service and get/commit the transaction yourself. Or create a Tapestry-facing Facade with the Tapestry annotations whose implementation delegates to the "vanilla" interface. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:05:14 -0300, <no-re...@comments.apache.org> wrote: > > Hello, >> John has commented on http://tapestry.apache.org/** >> integrating-with-jpa.html<http://tapestry.apache.org/integrating-with-jpa.html> >> . >> You can find the comment here: >> http://tapestry.apache.org/**integrating-with-jpa.html#**comment_1410<http://tapestry.apache.org/integrating-with-jpa.html#comment_1410> >> Please note that if the comment contains a hyperlink, it must be approved >> before it is shown on the site. >> >> Below is the reply that was posted: >> ~~~~ >> Adding implementations specific annotations to the service interfaces >> breaks the interface/implementation independence. >> ~~~~ >> > > I agree with this. What do you guys think? I think this is a serious > shotcoming in Tapestry-IoC. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com
