Thanks so much Bob, this is really important work.
Kalle
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Bob Harner <bobhar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looked over Uli's commits and didn't see any functional improvements that
> would be lost by replacing it with Dan Kulps improvements in the CXF
> project, so I did so, and rebuilt the site.
>
> Now Tapestry, CXF, Camel, Geronimo and Struts all appear to be using the
> same version of the export code.
>
> And it's once again safe to edit the pages in Confluence.
> On Sep 15, 2013 9:49 PM, "Bob Harner" <bobhar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Everybody,
> >
> > I finally got around to investigating this problem myself. Newer versions
> > of Confluence render {code} tags to HTML in a very different way than
> > previously, using http://alexgorbatchev.com/SyntaxHighlighter with
> > content inside of <script> tags instead of <pre> tags. Dan Kulp's
> > SiteExporter code (at
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/web/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cwiki/
> )
> > has already been updated to accommodate this nicely, but we are running
> an
> > outdated copy of that code (at
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry-site/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cwiki
> > )
> >
> > Locally I switched to a updated copy of SiteExporter code, adjusted the
> > Velocity template file to match, and now everything seems to work
> properly
> > (on my desktop copy), except for some minor CSS issues that I haven't
> > addressed yet. However, I haven't committed anything yet because I
> haven't
> > fully evaluated what changes Uli made to the SiteExporter code since he
> > made the copy. I'll do that in a day or so unless he answers the question
> > before then.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bob Harner <bobhar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everybody (especially Uli),
> >>
> >> I did a minor edit to the http://tapestry.apache.org/javascript.html<
> http://tapestry.apache.org/javascript.html#comment_1504> page
> >> recently and, although everything looked fine in the Confluence editor
> >> preview, when it was published all the {code} examples were omitted.
> >>
> >> Does anybody know what is broken in the publishing process?
> >>
> >> Missing {code} content was one of the issues noted and fixed with the
> >> switch to Confluence 5 a couple months back (
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6406), and they seemed to
> >> work fine in recent weeks, I believe.
> >>
> >> Maybe we are suffering from using an outdated copy of Dan Kulp's CFX
> >> export code?
> >>
> >
> >
>
