Tests fixed in 76982d5.

On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:09:46 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship <[email protected]> wrote:

I've remove tapestry-cdi from the build, in the interest of getting a beta
release out.

Now:

:tapestry-ioc:test

ioc.specs.BridgeBuilderSpec > when toString() is part of service interface,
it is forwarded through the filter FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.SpockComparisonFailure at
BridgeBuilderSpec.groovy:81

ioc.specs.DefaultModuleDefImplSpec > conflicting service ids result in an
exception FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError at
DefaultModuleDefImplSpec.groovy:147

ioc.specs.RegistryConstructionAndRuntimeErrorsSpec > duplicate service
names are a failure FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError at
RegistryConstructionAndRuntimeErrorsSpec.groovy:23

ioc.specs.ServiceLookupSpec > verify exception when accessing a service by
type and there are multiple matches FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.SpockComparisonFailure at
ServiceLookupSpec.groovy:68

ioc.specs.ValidatingConfigurationWrapperSpec > null may not be contributed
FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.SpockComparisonFailure at
ValidatingConfigurationWrapperSpec.groovy:78

ioc.specs.ValidatingMappedConfigurationWrapperSpec > may not contribute a
duplicate key FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError at
ValidatingMappedConfigurationWrapperSpec.groovy:100

ioc.specs.ValidatingMappedConfigurationWrapperSpec > contributing a null
value is an exception FAILED
    org.spockframework.runtime.SpockComparisonFailure at
ValidatingMappedConfigurationWrapperSpec.groovy:151

697 tests completed, 7 failed, 2 skipped
:tapestry-ioc:test FAILED

I haven't started looking into these yet ... I'm also minding both my kids
....



--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to