Hi,
this is related to TAP5-2238 and TAP5-2139.
If you @Import a JavaScript module in a page class, and that module is
part of a stack, the whole stack is imported.
If you require a JavaScript module from the client, and that module is
part of a stack, only the module is imported.
The behavior is different and that's caused issues and confusion for me
(again) in relation with TAP5-2139.
I have created a stack for a single module that cannot be minified
correctly. If I @Import it, it is added unminified, but if I require it
from the client, it is minified nonetheless.
I suggest that if a module is required from JS and the module is part of
a stack, we send a redirect to the stack.
Howard, your last comment in TAP5-2238 is, that this either unfixable or
invalid on its own. Could you explain why?
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
