It was encouraged at the ApacheCon Marketing talk to create such accounts, for nothing else but to claim the names.
I don't think we need to have (incubating) in the usernames, but in the profile names, yes! Username should be like @ApacheTaverna I would guess - that's the style I see searching for "Apache" users on Twitter. Perhaps the simplest is if a committer creates it with a long enough randomly generated password, and sends password to private@ - then the PPMC will have access and will have to treat it like updating the website, e.g. officially representing the project. If in doubt on what to respond to someone contacting us on one of those accounts, I would say reply with personal account (if it is public like on Twitter) or forward to private (if a question came in through a direct message). At the appropriate time, try to direct the contacting party to use the mailing lists. As a neutral Apache project we can't be seen to endorse third-party products/projects/research, but that should not mean we can't retweet "good stories about Taverna". >From your list I am not sure about Facebook or Google Calendar, but the rest look very relevant. Views? We should link to the accounts from /community/ on the website. On 12 Mar 2015 10:19, "Christian Brenninkmeijer" < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Do we have Apache Taverna accounts for: > > Twitter > YouTube > Googleplus > Facebook > SlideShare > Google Calendar > ect? > > If not what are the Apache standards for setting these up. > Thinks like, > What name to use? Should the name include "Incubator"? > Who should have admin password ect? > What to put on each and what not > > Christian > > >
