A couple of small questions: why did you choose ³taverna-parent-*² and
³taverna-language-*² rather than ³apache-taverna-*² for the release
artifacts? Looking over other apache incubating projects, many but not all
choose the ³apache-taverna-*² form but not all.

Also, why not use sha512?

Looking at the parent POM, I recommend you clean up the commented out
sections (repos at the end).

Marlon


On 7/29/15, 9:59 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <[email protected]> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Hello,
>
>Please use this thread to discuss any issues or queries related to
>
>Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC4
>Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating-RC4
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ian
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v2
>
>iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVuNw/AAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5KkAH/2YVVGhwSAPxajS/5afPdnqS
>7kvgW6A9HysXYQwNm8by2XTiH2gEarCG9Okl2AElUzjSJO2VNeop/Ug+DEoX2OBq
>XTk5LQvfZfB9LLOoEYWlyzOsYck9toXIhrvTbLRnHwjV6CEd3EyMXuS7hLBrtdUB
>irijj6W1r40aa776ew+w57IGqThtVTSvrbYNRXIsVbhi5PNARCV38aokdIrNvGpM
>cxJov9NZk0LVWYpWgV7Yjhp69frNqCgh2wkc9EICJj3BRD+tLOTYV7C2ZUphWbfB
>LhXttF6W8yENbvxrG15JiHJtFnBYzbzI6kj56PfkB51SSJox7ZyLz+QDazQUA78=
>=j1n4
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to