[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15145981#comment-15145981
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on TAVERNA-894:
---------------------------------------------
Apache NiFi's argument against Javadoc @author tags:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-nifi-dev/201505.mbox/%3CCAGHyZ6LcrZ1aPMUjJ%3DrJkkK19Cmveew7PmTUKuWprK_bz3jxmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
-- which I find myself agreeing with. Also http://s.apache.org/iZl --
perhaps this is a separate issue to discuss beyond taverna-osgi :)
> javadoc for taverna-osgi
> ------------------------
>
> Key: TAVERNA-894
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-894
> Project: Apache Taverna
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Taverna OSGi, Website
> Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Labels: javadoc
> Fix For: osgi 0.2.0
>
>
> taverna-osgi javadocs should be generated published on the website -
> particularly as there are various *-api modules.
> I've started the upload to
> http://taverna.incubator.apache.org/javadoc/taverna-osgi/ - but I think the
> javadocs themselves might need a quick click-through to see they are not too
> outdated/empty/wrong.
> Many of them will have @author David Withers as he did most of this work as
> part of Taverna 3 consultancy - but should we remove or keep these kind of
> @author tags under ASF? (David not a committer on Apache Taverna)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
