I think we should add it right away - it's already published and has a DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-1885-6
It is also open access (yay!) so we don't need to ask for a preprint. Are you OK to do the honours..? On 17 February 2016 at 18:50, Gale Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > At what point do you want to add papers to the References page? Should I > add this one now, with a notation that it's been "accepted for > publication," or some other status indicator? Or wait? > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:24 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> We would like to let you know that our paper "Scientific workflows for >> bibliometrics" has been accepted to the journal of Scientometrics and it is >> now online (and Open Access): >> http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-1885-6 >> >> In our paper, we explained why scientific workflows would be suitable for >> bibliometric analyses and presented several representative examples using >> Taverna workflows. We gave an overview of Taverna and its capabilities for >> such analyses. In addition, we uploaded our workflows on myExperiment where >> we have created the group for Bibliometrics and Scientometrics some time >> ago: http://www.myexperiment.org/groups/1278.html. >> >> To our knowledge, Taverna hasn't been used in the field of Bibliometrics >> and we are very excited to introduce it to this community. We have another >> paper that is currently under review. That one focuses on the integration >> of Web services for bibliometric analyses, and we hope that it gets >> accepted soon as well! >> >> If you have any comments please feel free to contact us. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Arzu Tugce Guler >> Leiden University Medical Center >> Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics >> P.O. Box 9600, Zone S3 >> 2300 RC Leiden >> The Netherlands >> Tel: +31 (0)71 526 9384 >> >> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
