I like it. I'll try to get something started in the next few days. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:48 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like how Groovy used the Project Maturity Model (see below) > > Perhaps we could maintain a similar doc in our wiki, add those > Taverna-specific requirements (e g. Command Line release), and then we can > mark what we think needs more work? > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[email protected]> > Date: 8 Mar 2016 10:41 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon > To: "Incubator General" <[email protected]> > Cc: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:16 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ...you're missing a proposed charter, the name of the proposed VP, who > > the initial committers, initial PMC, etc... > > And although it's not required, an assessment of the project's health > with respect the Project Maturity Model at [1] is very welcome. > > See for example the Groovy assessment at [2]. > > -Bertrand > > [1] > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > > [2] > > https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/576b3c5d6a7022ac4a8df1ef118666456ce627fb/MATURITY.adoc > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
